|
 Rotor/Stator wake/boundary layer interaction |
| . |
Rig250 speed line, comparison of fully turbulent and transitional computation |
| . |
Rig250 intermittency on blade profiles |
| . | | Virtually all turbomachinery flows involve turbulent phenomena, including transition from laminar to turbulent states. Thus, the adequate representation of transition and turbulence is crucial for the predictive accuracy of the computational method used in the turbomachinery design process. Since simulation methods like Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) and Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) are currently outside of the realm of industrial applications for Reynolds numbers typically found in turbomachinery aerodynamics, the solution of the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations forms the backbone for the numerical simulation of flows of industrial relevance. However, modelling assumptions of some kind have to be made, where transition and turbulence are addressed seperately. While turbulence modelling is based on statistics, transition modelling heavily relies on empirical correlations.
Turbulence Modelling
Flows in multistage turbomachinery are inherently unsteady. However, while unsteady simulations are of ever-increasing importance, steady RANS computations will remain the workhorse of industrial CFD for some time. Solving the RANS equations, a closure is needed for the Reynolds stresses. A variety of RANS methods exist, ranging from simple algebraic models up to Reynolds Stress Transport Models (RSTM). To date, however, transport-equation Eddy Viscosity Models (EVM) remain the backbone of turbulent viscous computations in the industrial design process. These models, however, have difficulties predicting e.g. pressure-induced separation and recirculation secondary flows, shock-induced separation and shock/boundary-layer interaction. Since the application of RSTM is currently still in a development stage, present efforts try to adopt a more feasible solution. A two-fold strategy is pursued here: While the inclusion of turbomachinery-specific extensions to two-equation EVM forms the backbone of the turbulence modelling effort, Explicit Algebraic Reynolds Stress Models (EARSM) are currently validated for turbomachinery flows.
Starting from the standard Wilcox 1988 k-w model, the former approach improves the prediction of viscous effects by successively implementing a fix for spurious production of turbulent energy as well as measures to account for the effects of compressibility and rotation, respectively. This enhanced model is used successfully as the standard turbulence representation in TRACE for both compressor and turbine flow computations. In contrast, EARSM are a class of non-linear EVM derived by a systematic approximation to the second moment closure. Unlike other, more empirical approaches to non-linear modelling, EARSM are rational approximations to RSTM and thus yield clear prospects with respect to model validity. This approach can be regarded as a generalized (non-linear) two-parameter model, which retains the predictive benefits of the second-moment closure methodology, while numerical advantages of the Boussinesq-viscosity concept are conserved. The EARSM ansatz is not yet used as a standard model in TRACE, however, the results obtained so far look promising.
The anisotropic nature of turbulence can also be accounted for by solving the transport equations for the six Reynolds stresses instead of the turbulent kinetic energy only. Effects like system rotation, stream line curvature and secondary flows, which are usually encountered in turbomachinery flows, are accounted for by an anisotropy resolving turbulence model and, therefore, the quality of prediction can be improved. Performance and stability, however, pose a challenge for the implementation. The focus of research is on the development of a RSTM which is applicable to industry relevant turbomachinery configurations.
With increasing computer power, unsteady computations will be of increasing importance to supplement the standard steady runs typically performed in the industrial design. Owing to the deficiencies of unsteady RANS, hybrid RANS-LES methods have drawn significant attention over the past decade. Such approaches attempt to overcome well-known deficiencies of RANS models regarding the prediction of separated flow by treating such regions in an LES-type manner, while at the same time retaining their undisputed performance for attached boundary layers. TRACE features a classical Detached-Eddy Simulation (DES) approach.
Transition Modelling
Even though the flow in a turbomachine is turbulent most of the time, it is very important to accurately predict where transition from laminar to turbulent flow takes place. The state of a boundary layer - laminar, transitional or turbulent - has a great impact on its properties, such as frictional losses or heat transfer in the fluid. Depending on the geometry of the component and the flow conditions, this transition process can happen in different places and follow different patterns or modes.
TRACE can use two different models to predict transition: An algebraic model (Multimode model), which uses integral values of the boundary layer to predict the different transition modes and a local, transport-equation-based model (g-ReQmodel) which uses local values of the flow. The models are coupled to the source mechanisms of the turbulence model and thus allow transport of turbulent quantities even in areas where flow is predicted to be laminar. |