Energy Blog | 15. March 2010 | posted by Jan Oliver Löfken | 8 Comments

Energy question of the week: Can lasers unleash the Sun's power to create a fusion reactor?

Low-cost, safe, climate-friendly and inexhaustible – many energy experts view nuclear fusion as the power source of the future. Having said that, scientists believe that it will take another 40 to 50 years before the first fusion power station is in operation. Hot plasma, trapped within a strong magnetic field is currently the most promising way forward, and Europeans in particular are focusing on this concept. However, might it not be much simpler and quicker to find a way to unleash the fire of the Sun by means of powerful lasers that American physicists are working with?

Using the power of 192 laser beams focused on a single point, scientists working on a 3.5-billion-dollar fusion experiment at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in California hope to pave the way for nuclear fusion. At temperatures in excess of 3 billion degrees Celsius, hydrogen nuclei fuse to form heavier helium nuclei, releasing vast amounts of energy in the process – significantly more than is required to trigger the nuclear fusion. Just a few weeks ago, the researchers reported in Science that test runs had been successful and that it would be possible to attempt the first fusion reaction later this year.

Nuclear fusion at 3.3 million degrees Celsius

"So far, it has been working better than anyone could have expected," said Siegfried Glenzer from the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at LLNL. For the last several years, his team has been preparing this gargantuan fusion experiment in collaboration with many colleagues from affiliated institutions. Housed in a building ten storeys high, covering an area equivalent to three football fields, the 192 laser beams are directed through elaborate optical equipment at a hollow cylinder made of gold and measuring just a few millimetres across. The energy concentrated on this point can measure up to 1.8 Megajoules. At a temperature of 3.3 million degrees Celsius, the gold evaporates and an implosion of charged particles and X-rays creates plasma. These conditions should be sufficient to cause hydrogen nuclei to fuse and form heavier helium nuclei.

Künstlerische Darstellung: Bei Temperaturen von drei Millionen Grad Celsius sollen Wasserstoffkerne zu schwereren Heliumkernen verschmelzen. Beide Bilder: NIF.

Artist's impression: at temperatures in excess of 3 million degrees Celsius, hydrogen nuclei fuse to form heavier nuclei of helium. Credit (both images): NIF.


To date, these preliminary trials have been carried out in the absence of the fuel required for nuclear fusion – the heavy hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium. In the course of this year, Dr Glenzer and colleagues are hoping to take the next step, which involves placing fusion fuel inside a beryllium capsule the size of a peppercorn at the centre of the hollow gold cylinder. It may then prove possible to ignite a fusion reaction that can be sustained without continued heating from the laser beams.

Race between laser fusion and the European ITER fusion reactor

When the laser fusion experiment enters this next crucial phase will be decided in June. Scientists are not yet able to tell whether it will in fact be possible to ignite a nuclear fusion reaction. Should they succeed, the American fusion experiment will be competing with the European ITER fusion reactor, which is under construction at Cadarache, southern France at present. In contrast to their American colleagues, the researchers at ITER are not using laser ignition. Instead, they are striving to create a million-degree plasma and to contain it within an extremely powerful magnetic field. In the predecessor to ITER, the JET test reactor in the UK, it proved possible to sustain a fusion reaction for a few seconds. Progress came in small steps, most of which were taken at German institutions in Karlsruhe, Garching and Greifswald, making ITER the current favourite in the race.

No one knows yet which concept will turn into the first viable fusion reactor. The only certainty is the researchers' forecast that it will be a few more decades before electrical power can be generated cost-effectively using nuclear fusion. If and when they are successful, be it with lasers or with magnetic fields, the future energy needs of mankind will be assured.

Further information on nuclear fusion:
ITER experimental fusion reactor
National Ignition Facility (NIF)

The DLR Energy question of the week in 'The future of energy' Year of Science

The Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) has given the Year of Science 2010 the motto 'The future of energy'. For this reason the science journalist Jan Oliver Löfken will this year answer a question on the subject of energy in his blog each week. Do you have a question about how our energy supply might look in the future? Or do you want to know, for example, how a wave power plant works and how it can efficiently generate electricity? Then send us your question by email. Science journalist Jan Oliver Löfken will investigate the answers and publish them each week in this blog.

TrackbackURL

About the author

Energy journalist Jan Oliver Löfken writes among other things, for the Technologie Review, Wissenschaft aktuell, Tagesspiegel, Berliner Zeitung and P.M. Magazin on issues involving energy research and industry. For DLR, he answered the Energy question of the week during the Year of Energy 2010. to authorpage

Comments

2 Comments | RSS-Feed Kommentare
Schreiben Sie einen Kommentar

Mandatory fields marked with *:

Comments will be proved - please check the blogrules!

Frank Philpot
02. July 2010 at 15:29

What nuclear reactions are there which could be used to generate power. Fission of Uranium or plutonium generates radioactive waste and need a large plant. Fusion of hydrogen need exotic isotopes and is not viable yet. Protons interact with Lithium to give alpha particles. Is this a useful source of energy?
>> What other reactions have been found that could be used without too much difficulty?

Jan Oliver Löfken
02. July 2010 at 15:31

Dear Mr Philpot,

you are principially right. There are a lot of different reactions
schemes and radioactic materials avaiable. A view on this graph show
you, that almost every element has an radioactic isotope
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Isotopes_and_half-life.svg).
But for power production you can´t use them. Only the known, harmful
materials like uranium, thorium or plutonium provide the potential of a
chain reaction and a self supported process.

Besten Gruß

Oliver