DLR Portal
Home|Sitemap|Contact|Accessibility Imprint and terms of use Privacy Cookies & Tracking |Deutsch
You are here: Home:News
Advanced Search
News
Institute
Departments
Projects
Publications
Offers
Test facilities
Print

New Methods to Analyze the Aeroelastic Stability of Future Lightweight Aero Engine Blades



Fig. 1: Very low mass ratio fan blades of the CRISPmulti geometry, currently in testbed M2VP at DLR site in Cologne. 

While the long-term goal is to make Europe’s aviation climate-neutral until the year 2050, the reduction of fuel consumption and thus CO2 emission is a major objective. To increase the efficiency and overall performance, larger fan diameters and higher bypass ratios are consistent trends. An associated technical requirement is lightweight design. The solutions are lighter materials like aluminum or composite (carbon-fiber reinforced plastics, abbr. CFRP) and hollow blades.These lightweight constructions require new methods to safely analyze the aeroelastic stability.

 

The Evolution of Turbofan Designs

Classical turbofan engine use titanium, which is a light, very strong and robust material, but expensive and not easy to machine or repair. For structural integrity, the fan blades do not need to be a solid metal block. Improvements in manufacturing techniques allow for more complex geometrical shapes as well as a hollow design (or sandwich construction).

Fig. 2: Different generations of turbofan engines.

The number of blades reduced over the years. The newer generation of fans are also called wide-chord fans because of their appearance with significantly longer chordlength than the older generations.

 

 

Fan blade of a Rolls-Royce RB211, introduced in 1969 (Image credit: David Fisher via Flickr.com Copyright CC BY 2.0). General Electric GEnx, introduced in 2007 (Image Credit: Aan’Allein via Flickr.com Copyright CC BY-NC 2.0).

 

Flutter or Aeroelastic Stability of the Blades

Flutter is a self-excited vibration of an elastic structure in a fluid flow. The phenomenon occurs when the motions of the structure cause such aerodynamic forces that the vibration amplitude isn’t damped and increases exponentially over time. This exponential nature of the phenomenon leads to rapid destruction and thus, flutter has to be avoided at all costs.

To do so, either structural damping or aerodynamic damping can be used. Modern fans and compressors have a very low structural damping (due to design aspects e.g. blade-integrated disks, abbr. blisk). Structural damping counteracts any aerodynamic excitation forces and is therefore a conservative margin. In early turbofan designs, the blades where equipped with mechanical dampers at approximately half the radius (Fig. 2, left side). These dampers, sometimes called snubber, were used to suppress vibrations of the blades, which could not be predicted by the design methods. Within the last decades, thanks to the increasing high-performance computing power and increasing accuracy of computational fluid dynamics (abbr. CFD) and computational structural mechanics (abbr. CSM), engineers were able to examine blade vibrations in more detail and eliminate designs which would lead to high vibration amplitudes. As a consequence, the snubbers are not needed anymore, which also improves the efficiency because the air flow is less disturbed.

Another aspect considered to damp blade vibration is the accurate prediction the aerodynamic damping in early design phases in order to exclude aerodynamic excitation by blade vibrations. In the past, simulations of such blade vibrations were performed at the blade natural frequency and the vibration motions were assumed to be in the modeshape associated to this natural frequency (deflection pattern that represents the relative displacement of all parts of a structure for that particular mode).

 

Flutter Analysis of Lightweight Engine Blades

With the consistent lightweight design of aero engine blades, the so-called mass ratio between structural components and the air flowing around the blades drops. At lower mass ratios, the blades are more susceptible to even small fluctuations in the unsteady aerodynamic forces. Below a certain level of mass ratio, structural vibrations and the aerodynamic forces can influence each other so strongly, that the vibrations do not occur at the natural frequency and the related modeshape anymore. The phenomenon is called coupled-mode flutter. It is well known from aircraft wing structures already and has been studied intensively over the decades.

Most current aero engines are assessed by the classical method which has been established for decades. The flutter-free operating range can be predicted with good confidence during the design phase. The mass ratio of these designs is still above a threshold where coupled-mode flutter becomes a concern.

zum Bild
Fig. 3: Compressor map of the CRISPmulti with flutter boundary. ADP means Aerodynamic Design Point, the operating condition with the highest aerodynamic efficiency, which is typically the cruise flight thrust setting.

Currently, a two-stage counter-rotating fan with a very low mass ratio is at the testbed of DLR in Cologne (Fig. 1). Using only the classical analysis method which leaves out the coupling effects, the flutter-free operating range is significantly overestimated (Fig. 3).

Although the mass ratio of the CRISPmulti rotor is far below that of current aero engine designs, the results emphasize that coupled-mode flutter will have to be respected for future generations of aero engine, especially fan blades.

 

 

Previously, the coupled-mode flutter phenomenon was not assessed in the design phase. At the DLR-Institute of Aeroelasticity, the expertise and developed numerical methods used to examine coupled-mode flutter in wing designs are transferred to aeroelastic analysis of aero engine blades. The method is adapted and refined for the usage on turbomachinery-specific numerical setups. Now coupled-mode flutter analysis can be included into the design phase of future aero engines.

 

Further reading recommendation:

  • Journal article: Schuff, Matthias and Chenaux, Virginie (2021), “Coupled Mode Flutter Analysis of Turbomachinery Blades Using an Adaptation of the p-k Method”. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. 
  • Research topic: Aeroelasticity of Turbomachinery
  • DLR-Institute of Propulsion Technology: Gegenläufige ummantelte Fans 

 

Author: Matthias Schuff, DLR Institute of Aeroelasticity, Department: Aeroelastic Experiments

 


Contact
Dr. rer. nat Holger Mai
Head of Aeroelastic Experiments

German Aerospace Center

Institute of Aeroelasticity

Göttingen

Tel.: +49 551 709-2481

Fax: +49 551 709-2862

Related Articles
Department Aeroelastic Experiments
Aeroelastic of Turbomachinery
more news
Co2-neutral flying - how can aeroelasticity contribute to this?
Aircraft Configurations with Distributed Propulsion – Effects on Loads, Structural Mass, and Aeroelasticity
Semi-active flutter suppression - Improvement of the flutter stability of an aircraft by steady spoilers deflection
New Methods to Analyze the Aeroelastic Stability of Future Lightweight Aero Engine Blades
No more vibrations! - Viscoelastic damping design for the reduction of aircraft vibrations with elastomers
How can an aircraft save weight and have a longer service life by deflecting the control surfaces?
Nonlinear effects in T-tail flutter - Numerical studies on the dynamic aeroelasticity of T-tails
Neuartige Aeroelastische Instabilitäten an Laminarflügeln
Wie laut wird es? - Die Kabinenakustik zukünftiger Flugzeuge
Highly Flexible Wings – How flexible are you?
German-French research cooperation for test of flexible aircraft wing
DLR conducts vibration tests on ISTAR
DLR con­ducts ground vi­bra­tion test on the Dornier 'Seast­ar' am­phibi­ous air­craft
Bending instead of snapping
DLR Göttingen tests commercial payload platform for the International Space Station
Intelligenter Flügel weicht Böen aus
Super-efficient wings take off
Related Topics
Structural Mechanics
Aerodynamic
Copyright © 2022 German Aerospace Center (DLR). All rights reserved.