In order to meet climate protection targets and improve air quality in urban areas, fundamental changes in the transport sector are needed in the near future. Vehicle concepts that have so far led a niche existence can contribute to this: small and light electric vehicles below the passenger car class (LEV), such as cargo bikes, or 3- and 4-wheeled electric vehicles in the L class. The best-known example of the latter is the Twizy from Renault. Small electric vehicles such as e-scooters, e-bikes and pedelecs are to be distinguished from these.
A study led by the DLR Institute of Vehicle Concepts together with the DLR Institute of Transport Research and the IMU Institute on behalf of e-mobil BW shows the differentiated potential of small and light electric vehicles (micro-vehicles such as e-scooters are not the subject of the study). The researchers also shed light on obstacles to the use of LEVs and the necessary changes to the framework conditions that could lead to a greater spread of this type of vehicle. The topics of the study range from the regulation and authorisation of vehicles to technology, market opportunities and potential uses (e.g. car journeys that can be replaced) as well as opportunities for Baden-Württemberg and fields of action for the promotion of LEVs.
As part of the study, experts from industry, politics and research were asked about vehicle technology, production, value creation and market potential. A key conclusion of the expert survey: without a change in the framework conditions for LEVs, a significant increase in market share is unlikely in the coming years. If widespread use of LEVs is desired in view of their potential contribution to climate protection, air quality and urban design, the vehicles must be promoted with a combination of push and pull measures. Examples of possible measures include traffic control interventions such as reserved lanes and parking spaces for LEVs on the one hand and an increase in the cost of using cars on the other (e.g. through charges or the introduction of toll systems).
In the view of the LEV study, LEVs should not represent a counter-proposal to active modes (walking and cycling) and public transport. LEVs can complement these forms of mobility, replace a certain proportion of car journeys and thus offer sustainable individual mobility for those user groups and use cases that require it. LEVs are mathematically suitable for around 50% of journeys currently made by car.
Further information can be found here.
Results
Client
e-mobil BW GmbH Landesagentur für neue Mobilitätslösungen und Automotive Baden-Württemberg
Project partners
• DLR Institut für Verkehrsforschung, Berlin
• IMU Institut, Stuttgart