DLR Portal
Home|Sitemap|Contact|Accessibility Imprint and terms of use Privacy Cookies & Tracking |Deutsch
You are here: Home:Research:Telepresence & VR:Human Factors
Advanced Search
Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics
Departments
Robotic Systems
Applications
Research
3D Perception
Leg-based Locomotion
Flying Robots
Intelligent Industrial Robotics
Medical Robotics
Compliant Robotic Systems
Re-enabling Robotics
Telepresence & VR
Telemanipulation
Stable Haptic Interaction and Control
Shared Autonomy
Haptic Rendering: Collision Detection and Response
ROMO
Human Factors
Multimodal Training of Mechanics and Astronauts
Interactive Robot Viewer
People
Projects
Spin-offs
Publications and downloads
Job offers
How to get to us
News Collection

Human Factors

Innovative telepresence systems have to fit the human body and capabilities. Engineers, industrial designers and psychologists work together to design systems that optimize human well-being and system performance at the same time. In the following, several examples of human factors topics at the Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics will be described.

Selected Topics

  • Identification of User Requirements
In the initial, analytical phase of a project, the needs of prospective users (e.g. surgeons) with respect to a proposed project or technical concept are analyzed.
Requirement analysis usually starts with the observation and description of current work practices (task analysis, tool analysis, stakeholder analysis, etc.). Additionally, users should be involved as early as possible (e.g. via interviews, workshops, scenarios and use cases) to identify and specify requirements.
Example: A context inquiry (field observations, interviews, etc.) was conducted to determine user requirements (of surgeons, assistants, scrub nurses) in the field of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Based on these requirements DLR's prototype MIRO was evaluated and further developed. Furthermore, a quantitative analysis of clinical team communication was performed to derive an information concept for telesurgery (Weber et al. 2012).
  • Experimental Evaluation of Technical Systems and Assistance Functions (Microworld Studies, Full Scale Simulations, etc.)
Throughout the concept and development phase of a project, technical systems (e.g. prototypes) or procedures should be tested in user studies. Results should support the further development of the system.
Both qualitative data (user feedback) as well as quantitative data (performance measures, activities) can be used for evaluation.
Example: A force feedback system (HUG) for VR as well as telepresence applications was evaluated in a user study with novices and virtual assembly experts (Weber et al. 2013).
  • Psychophysical Studies
When designing human-machine-interfaces the perceptual user experience (e.g. perception of haptic feedback) can play a crucial role. Physical stimulus characteristics are carefully and systematically manipulated and observers are asked to report their perception of these stimuli.
Example: A vibrotactile bracelet (VibroTac) was optimized by calibrating the intensities of each vibration segment in a way that haptic stimulus intensity is perceived as being equal at different locations at the human forearm (Weber et al. 2011).
  • Statistical Analysis of Empirical Data
Quantitative observational or experimental data can be analyzed and interpreted using statistical methods.
 
 

 Examples of Human Factors Activities at the Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics

  

Selected Publications

  • Weber, B., Sagardia, M., Hulin, T. & Preusche, C. (2013). Vibrotactile, Visual and Force Feedback of Collisions in Virtual Environments: Effects on Performance, Mental Workload and Spatial Orientation. In: R. Shumaker (Ed.): Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality /HCII 2013, Part I, LNCS 8021, pp. 241-250. Heidelberg: Springer. (Best Paper Award)
  • Weber, B., Schneider, A., Draschkow, D. & Hirzinger, G. (2012). Informationsaustausch in klinischen Teams bei Nutzung eines Robotersystems für minimal-invasive Chirurgie. In M. Grandt & S. Schmerwitz (Hrsg.): Fortschrittliche Anzeigesysteme für die Fahrzeug- und Prozessführung (S. 299-302). Bonn: DGLR.
  • Sagardia, M., Weber, B., Hulin, T. & Preusche, C. (2012). Evaluation of Visual and Force Feedback in Virtual Assembly Verifications. Virtual Reality Conference. USA: Orange County, CA. (Short Paper Honorable Mention)
  • Weber, B.; Schätzle, S.; Hulin, T.; Preusche, C.; Deml, B. (2011). Evaluation of a vibrotactile feedback device for spatial guidance, IEEE World Haptics Conference, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Friedrich, M.; Weber, B.; Schätzle, S.; Oberheid, H.; Preusche C.; Deml, B. (2010). Air traffic controller assistance systems for attention direction: Comparing visual, auditory, and tactile feedback. HFES European Chapter, Leeds, UK
  • Weber, B.; Deml, B.; Friedrich, M.; Schätzle, S.; Oberheid, H.; Preusche, C. (2010). Vibrotaktiles Feedback zur Aufmerksamkeitslenkung bei komplexen Lotsentätigkeiten, M. Grandt & A. Bauch (Hrsg.): Innovative Interaktionstechnologien für Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstellen, DGLR 2010

 

Links
MIRO
VibroTac - Vibrotactile Feedback Device
Copyright © 2023 German Aerospace Center (DLR). All rights reserved.