Flat premixed laminar CH4/air flames

McKenna Burner
Flat flame burner (McKenna) for premixed laminar flames
Credit:

DLR

Aims and Motivation

Flat premixed laminar flames offer the advantage of well-defined conditions with respect to flow field, gas concentrations, temperature profiles, and spatial uniformity. They are, thus, ideally suited for fundamental investigations or reference cases in various areas of combustion research. In our studies, they are used as calibration source for a laser Raman scattering system.

The gas composition in the post-flame region can be accurately calculated by flame simulation codes and the major species concentrations are very close to chemical equilibrium. A more complicated task is the determination of the temperatures of the gases because the flames are typically not adiabatic due to heat loss to the burner plate. In the investigations described here, Coherent anti-Stokes Raman Scattering (CARS) was used to measure the temperatures of 22 "standard" CH4/air flames at atmospheric pressure.

Burner and Flames

The burner is a commercially available flat flame burner with a sintered bronze disc (Holthuis & Associates, formerly McKenna Products). The diameter of the matrix is 60 mm, the annular shroud flow was not used in these investigations. The matrix was cooled by water with an inlet temperature of 16°C at a flow rate of 1 liter/s. Methane (purity 99.5%) and dry air were premixed and supplied to the burner at room temperature. The flow rates were adjusted by calibrated mass flow meters (Brooks 5850 and 5851) and are accurate within ±1%. The reference point within the exhaust gas of the burner and, thus, the measuring location for the temperature was on the axis of the burner 15 mm above the burner plate. This location was chosen because it allows good optical access and because temperature gradients are negligible around this point.

Temperature Measurements

The temperatures were measured with the mobile CARS system of our institute employing a USED CARS beam geometry [1,2,3]. The measuring volume had a diameter of approx. 0.15 mm and a length of 2 mm and was located on the burner axis at h=15 mm above the burner plate. For each flame, a series of 1200 single-pulse CARS spectra was measured from which the average temperature was determined. The accuracy of the temperature measurement is ±2.5%.

Exhaust Gas Composition

The exhaust gas composition was calculated using the "Gaseq" chemical equilibrium program [4] which computed the equilibrium composition for the product temperatures determined by the CARS measurements. The calculated major species mole fractions are displayed in the table, minor species, e.g., radicals or NO, are not listed. Therefore, the sum of the mole fraction is not always unity.

Results

The tables show the data of 22 premixed CH4/air flames at atmospheric pressure. The CH4 and air flows are given in standard liters per minute (slpm), i.e., volume flow at T=0 °C and p=1013 mbar. Phi is the equivalence ratio determined from the flow rates and T_ad is the adiabatic flame temperature for this equivalence ratio calculated with Gaseq starting from the unburnt gas mixtures (at T=300 K). The measured temperatures, T_CARS, are lower than T_ad because of heat transfer from the flame to the burner matrix. The heat transfer increases with decreasing distance Dh between the burner plate and the flame front. Dh is typically <1mm and increases with flow rate and decreases with the burning velocity which has its maximum value at phi about 1.1. These relationships explain qualitatively the temperature differences between T_ad and T_CARS as a function of flow rate and phi. The table displays further the mole fractions X of the major species calculated for the exhaust gas temperature T_CARS.

Measurements with an older burner of the same kind revealed temperatures which were systematically lower by an average of 26 K. Earlier measurements in H2/air flames stabilized on 3 different burners resulted in mean deviations of 11 K and 20 K [5]. Thus, different burners are not expected to behave identically, but the deviations are, from our experience smaller than the temperature measurement uncertainties of 2.5%.

Nr

CH4slpm

Air slpm

Phi

T ad/K

T_CARS

1

1.100

15.00

0.7

1838

1706

2

1.310

15.60

0.8

1997

1765

3

1.310

12.40

1.0

2226

1790

4

1.310

11.31

1.1

2211

1754

5

1.310

10.40

1.2

2137

1723

6

1.420

15.00

0.9

2134

1799

7

1.733

20.63

0.8

1997

1828

8

1.733

16.50

1.0

2226

1886

9

1.733

14.96

1.1

2211

1826

10

1.735

15.00

1.1

2211

1818

11

1.733

13.70

1.2

2137

1828

12

1.733

11.80

1.4

1980

1813

13

2.050

15.00

1.3

2057

1878

14

2.287

15.00

1.45

1942

1915

15

2.550

30.30

0.8

1997

1967

16

2.550

0.9

0.9

2134

1976

17

2.550

24.14

1.0

2226

2009

18

2.550

22.00

1.1

2211

1934

19

2.550

20.20

1.2

2137

1883

20

2.550

17.43

1.39

1980

1929

21

3.420

36.18

0.9

2134

2110

22

3.420

32.40

1.0

2226

2100

Nr.

X(O2)

X(N2)

X(H2O)

X(CO2)

X(CO)

X(H2)

1

0.0577

0.7349

0.1367

0.0684

0.0000

0.0000

2

0.0379

0.7279

0.1547

0.0774

0.0001

0.0000

3

0.0005

0.7144

0.1894

0.0942

0.0008

0.0004

4

0.0000

0.6951

0.1886

0.0793

0.0223

0.0147

5

0.0000

0.6764

0.1844

0.0673

0.0406

0.0313

6

0.0185

0.7209

0.1723

0.0862

0.0001

0.0001

7

0.0376

0.7276

0.1546

0.0774

0.0001

0.0001

8

0.0009

0.7138

0.1888

0.0933

0.0016

0.0008

9

0.0000

0.6951

0.1891

0.0788

0.0229

0.0141

10

0.0000

0.6951

0.1890

0.0788

0.0228

0.0142

11

0.0000

0.6763

0.1857

0.0660

0.0419

0.0300

12

0.0000

0.6417

0.1734

0.0484

0.0710

0.0654

13

0.0000

0.6585

0.1809

0.0554

0.0584

0.0466

14

0.0000

0.6336

0.1711

0.0435

0.0786

0.0729

15

0.0371

0.7268

0.1540

0.0770

0.0004

0.0004

16

0.0182

0.7201

0.1716

0.0856

0.0007

0.0003

17

0.0017

0.7128

0.1877

0.0917

0.0031

0.0014

18

0.0000

0.6950

0.1897

0.0780

0.0237

0.0134

19

0.0000

0.6763

0.1863

0.0653

0.0426

0.0293

20

0.0000

0.6433

0.1757

0.0474

0.0715

0.0618

21

0.0183

0.7189

0.1704

0.0844

0.0018

0.0007

22

0.0029

0.7111

0.186

0.0891

0.0055

0.0023

References

  • [1] R. Lückerath, M. Woyde, W. Meier, W. Stricker, U. Schnell, H.-C. Magel, J. Görres, H. Spliethoff, H. Maier: Comparison of Coherent anti-Stokes Raman-Scattering Thermometry with Thermocouple Measurements and Model Predictions in both Natural-Gas and Coal-Dust Flames.
    Appl. Opt. 34. 3303 (1995)
  • [2] W. Stricker: Measurement of Temperature in Laboratory Flames and Practical Devices, in: Applied Combustion Diagnostics, edt. by K. Kohse-Höinghaus and J.B. Jeffries, Taylor & Francis, pp.155-193, New York (2002)
  • [3] A.C. Eckbreth:
    Laser Diagnostic for Combustion Temperature and Species.
    Gordon and Breach. Amsterdam (1996)
  • [4] Gaseq - A Chemical Equilibrium Program for Windows, http://www.gaseq.co.uk/
  • [5] S. Prucker, W. Meier, W. Stricker:
    A Flat Flame Burner as Calibration Source for Combustion Research: Temperatures and Species Concentrations of Premixed H2/Air Flames.
    Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65. 2908 (1994)