Flat flame burner (McKenna) for premixed laminar flames
Credit:
DLR
Aims and Motivation
Flat premixed laminar flames offer the advantage of well-defined conditions with respect to flow field, gas concentrations, temperature profiles, and spatial uniformity. They are, thus, ideally suited for fundamental investigations or reference cases in various areas of combustion research. In our studies, they are used as calibration source for a laser Raman scattering system.
The gas composition in the post-flame region can be accurately calculated by flame simulation codes and the major species concentrations are very close to chemical equilibrium. A more complicated task is the determination of the temperatures of the gases because the flames are typically not adiabatic due to heat loss to the burner plate. In the investigations described here, Coherent anti-Stokes Raman Scattering (CARS) was used to measure the temperatures of 22 "standard" CH4/air flames at atmospheric pressure.
Burner and Flames
The burner is a commercially available flat flame burner with a sintered bronze disc (Holthuis & Associates, formerly McKenna Products). The diameter of the matrix is 60 mm, the annular shroud flow was not used in these investigations. The matrix was cooled by water with an inlet temperature of 16°C at a flow rate of 1 liter/s. Methane (purity 99.5%) and dry air were premixed and supplied to the burner at room temperature. The flow rates were adjusted by calibrated mass flow meters (Brooks 5850 and 5851) and are accurate within ±1%. The reference point within the exhaust gas of the burner and, thus, the measuring location for the temperature was on the axis of the burner 15 mm above the burner plate. This location was chosen because it allows good optical access and because temperature gradients are negligible around this point.
Temperature Measurements
The temperatures were measured with the mobile CARS system of our institute employing a USED CARS beam geometry [1,2,3]. The measuring volume had a diameter of approx. 0.15 mm and a length of 2 mm and was located on the burner axis at h=15 mm above the burner plate. For each flame, a series of 1200 single-pulse CARS spectra was measured from which the average temperature was determined. The accuracy of the temperature measurement is ±2.5%.
Exhaust Gas Composition
The exhaust gas composition was calculated using the "Gaseq" chemical equilibrium program [4] which computed the equilibrium composition for the product temperatures determined by the CARS measurements. The calculated major species mole fractions are displayed in the table, minor species, e.g., radicals or NO, are not listed. Therefore, the sum of the mole fraction is not always unity.
Results
The tables show the data of 22 premixed CH4/air flames at atmospheric pressure. The CH4 and air flows are given in standard liters per minute (slpm), i.e., volume flow at T=0 °C and p=1013 mbar. Phi is the equivalence ratio determined from the flow rates and T_ad is the adiabatic flame temperature for this equivalence ratio calculated with Gaseq starting from the unburnt gas mixtures (at T=300 K). The measured temperatures, T_CARS, are lower than T_ad because of heat transfer from the flame to the burner matrix. The heat transfer increases with decreasing distance Dh between the burner plate and the flame front. Dh is typically <1mm and increases with flow rate and decreases with the burning velocity which has its maximum value at phi about 1.1. These relationships explain qualitatively the temperature differences between T_ad and T_CARS as a function of flow rate and phi. The table displays further the mole fractions X of the major species calculated for the exhaust gas temperature T_CARS.
Measurements with an older burner of the same kind revealed temperatures which were systematically lower by an average of 26 K. Earlier measurements in H2/air flames stabilized on 3 different burners resulted in mean deviations of 11 K and 20 K [5]. Thus, different burners are not expected to behave identically, but the deviations are, from our experience smaller than the temperature measurement uncertainties of 2.5%.
Nr
CH4slpm
Air slpm
Phi
T ad/K
T_CARS
1
1.100
15.00
0.7
1838
1706
2
1.310
15.60
0.8
1997
1765
3
1.310
12.40
1.0
2226
1790
4
1.310
11.31
1.1
2211
1754
5
1.310
10.40
1.2
2137
1723
6
1.420
15.00
0.9
2134
1799
7
1.733
20.63
0.8
1997
1828
8
1.733
16.50
1.0
2226
1886
9
1.733
14.96
1.1
2211
1826
10
1.735
15.00
1.1
2211
1818
11
1.733
13.70
1.2
2137
1828
12
1.733
11.80
1.4
1980
1813
13
2.050
15.00
1.3
2057
1878
14
2.287
15.00
1.45
1942
1915
15
2.550
30.30
0.8
1997
1967
16
2.550
0.9
0.9
2134
1976
17
2.550
24.14
1.0
2226
2009
18
2.550
22.00
1.1
2211
1934
19
2.550
20.20
1.2
2137
1883
20
2.550
17.43
1.39
1980
1929
21
3.420
36.18
0.9
2134
2110
22
3.420
32.40
1.0
2226
2100
Nr.
X(O2)
X(N2)
X(H2O)
X(CO2)
X(CO)
X(H2)
1
0.0577
0.7349
0.1367
0.0684
0.0000
0.0000
2
0.0379
0.7279
0.1547
0.0774
0.0001
0.0000
3
0.0005
0.7144
0.1894
0.0942
0.0008
0.0004
4
0.0000
0.6951
0.1886
0.0793
0.0223
0.0147
5
0.0000
0.6764
0.1844
0.0673
0.0406
0.0313
6
0.0185
0.7209
0.1723
0.0862
0.0001
0.0001
7
0.0376
0.7276
0.1546
0.0774
0.0001
0.0001
8
0.0009
0.7138
0.1888
0.0933
0.0016
0.0008
9
0.0000
0.6951
0.1891
0.0788
0.0229
0.0141
10
0.0000
0.6951
0.1890
0.0788
0.0228
0.0142
11
0.0000
0.6763
0.1857
0.0660
0.0419
0.0300
12
0.0000
0.6417
0.1734
0.0484
0.0710
0.0654
13
0.0000
0.6585
0.1809
0.0554
0.0584
0.0466
14
0.0000
0.6336
0.1711
0.0435
0.0786
0.0729
15
0.0371
0.7268
0.1540
0.0770
0.0004
0.0004
16
0.0182
0.7201
0.1716
0.0856
0.0007
0.0003
17
0.0017
0.7128
0.1877
0.0917
0.0031
0.0014
18
0.0000
0.6950
0.1897
0.0780
0.0237
0.0134
19
0.0000
0.6763
0.1863
0.0653
0.0426
0.0293
20
0.0000
0.6433
0.1757
0.0474
0.0715
0.0618
21
0.0183
0.7189
0.1704
0.0844
0.0018
0.0007
22
0.0029
0.7111
0.186
0.0891
0.0055
0.0023
References
[1] R. Lückerath, M. Woyde, W. Meier, W. Stricker, U. Schnell, H.-C. Magel, J. Görres, H. Spliethoff, H. Maier: Comparison of Coherent anti-Stokes Raman-Scattering Thermometry with Thermocouple Measurements and Model Predictions in both Natural-Gas and Coal-Dust Flames. Appl. Opt. 34. 3303 (1995)
[2] W. Stricker: Measurement of Temperature in Laboratory Flames and Practical Devices, in: Applied Combustion Diagnostics, edt. by K. Kohse-Höinghaus and J.B. Jeffries, Taylor & Francis, pp.155-193, New York (2002)
[3] A.C. Eckbreth: Laser Diagnostic for Combustion Temperature and Species. Gordon and Breach. Amsterdam (1996)
[5] S. Prucker, W. Meier, W. Stricker: A Flat Flame Burner as Calibration Source for Combustion Research: Temperatures and Species Concentrations of Premixed H2/Air Flames. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65. 2908 (1994)